European Financial and Accounting Journal 2022, 17(1):7-24 | DOI: 10.18267/j.efaj.265

IFRS Adoption and the Financial Statements Comparability: The Case of Russia and Canada

Tatiana Dolgikh1
1 Prague University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Finance and Accounting, Department of Financial Accounting and Auditing, Winston Churchill Square 1938/4, 130 67 Prague, Czech Republic, tatiana.dolgikh@vse.cz

The effect of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption on the level of financial statements comparability was investigated for Russia in the current article. Canada was chosen for comparison due to the close time frame of IFRS adoption, which also allowed comparing the influence of IFRS adoption for both types of economies – well developed and emerging. Initial sample selection had been created from 23 companies that are presented on the stock exchange markets of the particular countries. Each sample contains semi-annual data for four years of the pre-adoption period (2008 to 2011 for Russia, 2007 to 2010 for Canada) in which companies use their home country accounting standards and four years of the post-adoption period (2012 to 2015 for Russia, 2011 to 2014 for Canada) in which companies use IFRS standards. The research was performed on the country level and industry level for both countries. Two measures had been used for the research: earnings-return regression and earnings-cash flow regression. The overall result of the study shows that the application of IFRS improved information comparability between companies only in Canada, while the same was not the case for Russian companies and the cross-country comparability. However, the study confirms an increase in the comparability level in the post-adoption period in such industries as Energy and Basic materials not only between companies inside of the given country but on the cross-country level as well.

Keywords: IFRS; Comparability; Russia; Canada
JEL classification: M41, M42

Published: October 21, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dolgikh, T. (2022). IFRS Adoption and the Financial Statements Comparability: The Case of Russia and Canada. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 17(1), 7-24. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.265
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alon, A., Dwyer, P. D., 2014. Early Adoption of IFRS as a Strategic Response to Transitional and Local Influences. The International Journal of Accounting, 49(3), 348-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.intacc.2014.07.003. Go to original source...
    2. Callao, S., Jarne, J. I., Lainez, J. A., 2007. Adoption of IFRS in Spain: Effect on the Comparability and Relevance of Financial Reporting. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16(2), 148-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2007.06.002. Go to original source...
    3. Cascino, S., Gassen, J., 2015. What Drives the Comparability Effect of Mandatory IFRS Adoption? Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), 242-282. DOI: 10.10007/s11142-014-9296-5. Go to original source...
    4. Chen, C. W., Collins, D. W., Kravet, T., Mergenthaler, R. D., 2018. Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 164-202. DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12380. Go to original source...
    5. Chircop, J., Collins, D. W., Hass, L. H., Nguyen, N. Q., 2020. Accounting Comparability and Corporate Innovative Efficiency. The Accounting Review, 95(4), 127-151. DOI: 10.2308/accr-52609. Go to original source...
    6. De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., Verdi, R. S., 2011. The Benefits of Financial Statements Comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895-931. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2011.00415.x. Go to original source...
    7. European Commission, 2021. Russia. EU trade relations with Russia. Facts, figures and latest developments. Available from: <https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/countries/russia/>. [17 October 2021].
    8. IASB, 2010. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (rev. 2018). Available from: <https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/list-of-standards/conceptual-framework/>. [17 October 2021].
    9. IFRS Foundation, 2021a. Who uses IFRS Accounting Standards? Available from: <https://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/>. [17 October 2021].
    10. IFRS Foundation, 2021b. IFRS Standards - Application Around the World. Jurisdictional Profile: Russia. Available from: <https://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/view-jurisdiction/russia/>. [17 October 2021].
    11. IFRS Foundation, 2021c. IFRS Standards - Application Around the World. Jurisdictional Profile: Canada. Available from: <https://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/view-jurisdiction/canada/>. [17 October 2021].
    12. Interfax, 2021. Corporate Information Disclosure Center. Available from: <https://e-disclosure.ru/>. [17 October 2021].
    13. Khan S., Anderson M., Warsame H., Wright M., 2019. Has Adoption of IFRS Increased Non-North American Institutional Investment in the Canadian Stock Markets? Accounting Perspectives, 18(2), 71-93. DOI: 10.1111/1911-3838.12200. Go to original source...
    14. Khdir, S. H., Bialek-Jaworska, A., 2020. IFRS Adoption in Emerging Markets: the Case of Iraq. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 106(162), 177-190. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.9004. Go to original source...
    15. Liao, Q., Sellhorn, T., Skaife, H. A., 2012. The Cross-Country Comparability of IFRS Earnings and Book Values: Evidence from France and Germany. Journal of International Accounting Research, 11(1), 155-184. DOI: 10.2308/jiar-10215. Go to original source...
    16. Ministry of Finance, 1995. Federal Law No. 208-FZ from 26.12.1995 with the latest Amendments and Additions On Joint Stock Companies. Available from: <https://gss.unicreditgroup.eu/sites/default/files/markets/documents/Federal%20Law%20on%20Joint%20Stock%20Companies.pdf>. [17 October 2021].
    17. Mukai, I., 2017. IFRS Application and the Comparability of Financial Statements. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 17(5), 52-63. ISSN 2158-3625.
    18. Mongrut, S., Winkelried, D., 2019. Unintended Effects of IFRS Adoption on Earnings Management: The Case of Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 377-388. DOI: 10.1016/j.ememar.2018.11.004. Go to original source...
    19. Neel, M., 2017. Accounting Comparability and Economic Outcomes of Mandatory IFRS Adoption. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1), 658-690. DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12229. Go to original source...
    20. Ben Othman, H., Kossentini, A., 2015. IFRS Adoption Strategies and Theories of Economic Development: Effects on the Development of Emerging Stock Markets. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 5(1), 70-121. DOI: 10.1108/jaee-02-2012-0006. Go to original source...
    21. Roca, F., 2021. The influence of mandatory adoption of IFRS in Argentina on value relevance of accounting information. Journal of Applied Economics, 24(1), 154-172. DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2021.1900695. Go to original source...
    22. Temiz, H., Güleç, Ö. F., 2017. Mandatory Adoption of IFRS in Emerging Markets: the Case of Turkey. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(4), 560-580. DOI: 10.24818/jamis.2017.04007. Go to original source...
    23. Thomson Reuters, 2021. Thomson Reuters Business Classification. Available from: <https://trader.fandom.com/wiki/Thomson_Reuters_Business_Classification>. [17 October 2021].
    24. Yip, R. W. Y., Young, D., 2012. Does Mandatory IFRS Adoption Improve Information Comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767-1789. DOI: 10.2308/accr-50192. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content